The Grammaticalization of Verb Tense and Aspect in Languages with Different Structures
https://doi.org/10.26907/2658-3321.2024.7.3.323-334
Abstract
In this article, the grammaticalization of verb tense and aspect in languages with different structures is studied. The languages include Russian (synthetic inflectional), English (analytic inflectional), and Japanese (agglutinative). The analysis is carried out with respect to the degree of grammaticalization, i.e. the ratio of analytical and synthetic structures, the grammaticalization of particular verbs, and the existence of particular aspect and tense categories. During the anal ysis it has been discovered that the Russian language has few structures and a high degree of their syntheticity, as well as a low variety of categories and grammaticalized lexical items, while the English and Japanese languages have an opposite tendency with a high number of structures and a high degree of their analyticity on the one hand and a high variety of categories and lexical items on the other. At the same time, it has been discovered that the similarities between the English and Japanese languages are quantitative rather than qualitative. Based on our findings we came to the conclusion that the grammaticalization of verb aspect and tense in the Russian language can be characterized as intensive and in the English and Japanese languages – as extensive, and that these differences are the result of the morphosyntax of these languages.
About the Author
A. R. AymetdinovRussian Federation
Aymetdinov Albert Radikovich – Assistant
Kazan
References
1. The Russian National Corpus. 2003–2024. Available from: ruscorpora.ru [accessed: 22.04.2024] (in Russ.) 2. Corpus of Global Web-Based English, 2013. Available from: https://www.englishcorpora.org/glowbe/. [accessed: 25.04.2024]
2. Maekawa K., Yamazaki M., Ogiso T. et al. Balanced corpus of contemporary written Japanese. Language Resources and Evaluation 2014;48(2):345–371 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-013-9261-0 .
3. Klimonov V.D. Lexical aspect in Russian: conseptual representation and categorization. Voprosi kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2005;1(004):21–25. (in Russ.)
4. Egorov D.S. Functional features of verb form transposition (present into the future) in the modern Russian language. Filologiya I Kultura. 2014;4(38):75–78. (in Russ.)
5. Sheveleva M.N. On the competing constructions in the history of analytical future formation in Russian. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. 2021;6:69–81. (in Russ.)
6. Pereira S., Guterres C.F., Bui J. The students’ ability of using present continuous tense. Journal of Innovative Studies on Character and Education. 2020;4(1):117–126.
7. Tagliamonte S. A., Durham M., Smith J. Grammaticalization at an early stage: future ‘be going to’ in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics. 2014;18(1):75– 108. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674313000282
8. Mindt I. The diachronic development of ‘come to V’. Silesian Studies in English 2015; 2016;38–59.
9. Sergeeva E.V., Khisonopulo E.Yu. Discourse functions of auxiliary verbs within past tense structures in the modern English language. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2008;2(4):162–166. (in Russ.)
10. Mori H. Modality and reanalyzed structure of V-te-miro conditional imperatives. Gengo Kenkyu. 2014;145:1–26. (in Jap.)
11. Kondo K. An inquiry into the grammaticalization process of Japanese auxiliary verbs: With special reference to -te shimau and -te oku. Studies in Language Sciences: Journal of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences. 2014;13:96–123.
12. Yui K. The process of abstraction of Japanese verb meanings: an analysis of verbs ‘iku’, ‘kuru’ and ‘miru’ Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters, Osaka University. 1996;36:1–29. (in Jap.)
Review
For citations:
Aymetdinov A.R. The Grammaticalization of Verb Tense and Aspect in Languages with Different Structures. Kazan linguistic journal. 2024;7(3):323-334. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2658-3321.2024.7.3.323-334
